gsol

http://www.goal.com/en/news/10/italy/2010/04/26/1895977/juventus-fans-send-letter-to-figc-demanding-calciopoli La voce e' arrivata ben oltre l'Italia. Ora tutti vi stanno seguendo

tanto per inizziare; http://juventus.theoffside.com/team-news/from-j1897-a-letter-to-the-figc-juventus-and-all-juventus-fans.html Fra pocco sara' anche sulle prime pagine di altri siti

Tradotta a la lettera in inglese e lo mandero' a diversi siti e anche ad altri contatti che lo potrebbero tradurre in altre lingue. Voglio vedere quante magliette venderanno l'anno prossimo.

GEA UPDATE: Since the initial accusations much has surfaced from the still ongoing GEA hearings. I have gathered as much as I can from various newspapers regarding the testimonies and I will present that here. Before doing so however I will utilize simple mathematics to discredit the first accusation against GEA. The accusation that GEA commanded a monopolistic market share of players and coaches throughout Serie A. At its peak GEA had the contracts of 262 players and 11 coaches. The players and coaches were spread out across Serie A, B and Europe. This sounds like a lot. It raised many questions in the public but did anyone think that a Monopoly should consist of much more? Omitting the 10-15 players that were registered outside Italian football the number goes down to approximately 250. Serie A is comprised of 20 teams and Serie B 22 teams. Each team has an average roster of 22 players. A total of 42 teams X 22 players gives us 924 players in Italy?s top two divisions. If GEA represented only 250 of them?where is the Monopoly? That amounts to about 27% of Italy?s players. What of the other 73%. How could a company with a minority market share be accused of operating a monopoly? Even the coach representation amounted to about 24% in Italy. What of the rest? So much for accusation number 1. So how does Juventus tie in with the GEA Trial? The second accusation is that Luciano Moggi used his position as Alessandro Moggi?s father to ?threaten? players into handing their contracts over to GEA agents or else. The idea is that Moggi so controlled the market and teams that he could single handedly place players where he wanted. Evidence? Nah. You don?t need that when you accuse Luciano Moggi, all that?s really needed is he accusation as we?ve seen in the past but there are witnesses this time around. Let?s explore who they are and what they have stated in court shall we: Antonio Caliendo: Antonio is a successful player promoter who earns a living by obtaining endorsement deals for famous footballers. He had a long list of accusations regarding GEA?s interference with his operations which seemed to rarely tie into his initial police report. Names, dates, and activities were consistently inconsistent which led to him being reprimanded in court for false testimony. It should also be note that Caliendo was arrested in 1991 and plead guilty to corruption charges receiving a 10 month sentence. He was again arrested after the downfall of Hellas Verona for?you guessed it?corruption charges. Stefano Antonelli: Stefano was Blasi?s former agent who accused GEA of forcing Blasi to abandon him and accept GEA representation. His evidence was a wiretap he had recorded himself after calling Blasi?s father. We?ll come back to him in a moment. Zdenek Zeman: Zdenek?good old Zdenek. Once again testifying against Luciano Moggi. Zeman made a lot of very general accusations. When he was asked for proof he came up with nothing. When asked what specific rules GEA violated he responded by saying ?I do not possess specific details? meaning he went to court with?what? Hearsay? Marco Trabucchi: Originally of Russian descent accused GEA of forcefully requesting the contract of Salernitana keeper Ruslan Nigmatullin. The forceful nature of the demand consisted of ?all inclusive stay at a luxury hotel including pre-paid Mercedes rental?. That?s some vicious shit huh? Of course it was later revealed that Marco Trabucchi is in fact wanted by the FBI for association with one of Moscow?s most dangerous crime syndicates (Izmailovskaya). Franco Baldini: Franco is a long time enemy of the triade who accused GEA of not allowing players the chance to play in his Roma squad (where he was a director). Unfortunately for him the players (Chiellini, Baiocco) admitted that they personally desired Juventus over Roma and therefore refused the Roma transfers. This is the same Baldini who began the accusing during Farsopoli regarding the yellow card system (which the trial itself discredited). This is the same Baldini who is a long time friend of Attlio Auricchio (police officer in charge of verifying the Farsopoli wiretaps in 2006) who is under indictment with Baldini for issuing threats regarding the accounting fraud trial that saw Roma put under the microscope along with other clubs. Furthermore Attilio has already been charged with an early 90s evidence tampering charge. Baldini was also connected with the Recoba passport scandal and is currently facing potential charges for perjuring himself in the GEA trial. Not the most credible of sources so far. Maybe the players themselves will shed more light on the situation. A brief list of has been, washed up, and in some cases broke footballers were brought in one at a time by prosecutors to confirm Moggi?s omnipotence within the player market. Here is the high level summary of the accusations: Marco Rigoni: Marco claimed he was sold by Juventus to an inferior squad because he wouldn?t sign with GEA. The trial revealed that he had suffered career altering injuries after a car accident which rendered him near useless. Nicola Amoruso: Amoruso blamed Moggi and GEA for punishing him after he too refused to sign with GEA. He was sold to lesser clubs and s a result according to Amoruso, his career was ruined. Those of us who remember Amoruso remember a player all too often left on the bench because the squad possessed far superior talent in attack (Del Piero, Trezeguet, Inzaghi). He was sold because he couldn?t find space on the squad according to Luciano Moggi?we saw that with our own eyes. Salvatore Fresi: The few who recall this unfamiliar face will likely recall his antics in Coppa Italia matches since he rarely was fielded ahead of the likes of Montero, Thuram, Ferrara etc. in Juventus? defense. The player lacked the skill to make a starting 11 spot for himself but blamed Moggi for ruining his career by selling him to Perugia against his will for not having signed with GEA. He claimed that Moggi stated ?do what we say or you will never play again? and ?if you stay you will train alone in the mountains?. The defense managed to extract a crucial detail in court however that rendered his testimony to laughable. It was revealed that when the transfer was finalized, Fresi threw a party at his home complete with champagne to commemorate his massive financial gain. Fresi was then asked to step down. Later Marcello Lippi confirmed that he no longer wanted Fresi because he was useless and caused too many problems in the locker room. No players wanted to have him around. Fabrizio Miccoli: This is my favorite. His own non Gea agent (Franceso Calandro) claimed that there was no mobbing involved in Miccoli?s transfer activities on an Italian radio station. What he stated was that Micolli wanted to be transferred for three reasons: 1) he wasn?t allowed to celebrate the 2002-2003 scudetto with the team (he plaid for Perugia and only arrived in the summer) which he took offense to. 2) he was pressured to accept a transfer to Portsmouth (though he never actually went) 3) he wasn?t allowed to wear earrings on the field This story changed when the trial surfaced and suddenly Moggi an GEA ruined Micolli?s career by loaning him around. Simply put, Del Piero and Trezeguet were the dominant strikers in his stay at Juve and as a result he saw very little playing time in the 2003-2004 season. With the arrival of Mutu and Ibrahimovic in the summer of 2004 Miccoli (along with Di Vaio) were seen as an excess in the payroll department. Micolli requested to be moved and was therefore sent to Fiorentina where he did not impress. Fiorentina made no offer to retain him and Micolli was then sent to Benfica where he enjoyed regular playing time and the two best seasons of his career?poor guy. When Benfica made no offer to retain him he stated that he had no intention of returning to Juventus and was therefore sold to Palermo?Moggi and GEA were long gone. Similar accusations but is there any evidence that demonstrates anything more than the simple buying and selling of players? A short list of players that confirmed they never felt pressured to sign with GEA in court: Fabio Gatti Davide Baiocco Riccardo Allegretti Giorgio Chiellini David Trezeguet Christian Molinaro Fabio Capello Emanuele Blasi Marcello Lippi Marcello Lippi confirmed that he never felt pressured to bring certain players to the World Cup. He received suggestions from many including Moggi who actually suggested Miccoli but Lippi opted not to bring him. Emanuele Blasi?s testimony sent shock waves throughout the courtroom. He was initially brought in by the prosecutors after a wiretap revealed a conversation between him and his old agent (Antonelli) where Blasi states that he is being forced to leave him and accept GEA agent representation. In court Blasi admitted that he lied to his old agent to spare his feelings. He was no longer satisfied with him and wanted Davide Lippi to represent him. To this day, Davide is his agent and GEA has been closed down since 2006. Far cry from what the press says isn?t it? For two years every anti-Juventino arguing in favor of Calciopoli that has had their arguments dismantled has referred to the GEA influence as a last resort without knowing what is happening at all. Finally Capello and Giraudo were charged with false testimony after defending Moggi and Gea. Though their testimony never contradicted their reports the two may face eventual charges. It appears as though the prosecution has recently adapted a new procedure; anyone who testifies in defense of the accused will be charged. Of course nothing will come of the charges since there are no contradictions to speak of but by being under indictment, their testimonies will be discredited. Someone should explain why no others on the prosecutors side have been charged considering the numerous contradictions found thus far. http://www.espnsoccernet.it/news/story?id=529935&cc=null http://www.pupia.tv/sport/notizie/000102.html http://www.siciliainformazioni.com/giornal...-nazionaler.htm http://kr.goal.com/it/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=646841 http://www.corrieredellosport.it/Notizie/C...iraudo+indagati http://www.spysport.org/processo-gea-moggi...lo-accusano.htm All other articles can be found in this Calciomercato search engine that gathers articles from various Italian papers: http://www.calciomercato.com/index.php?n=search

The press has gone strangely silent on this one. Mancini, Sinisa, and Stankovic have threatened legal action for defamation of character. There are 200 calls between the mafioso and Inter personnel which speak of possible drug deals and player gambling. Time will tell but I think that much like passaportopoli, the telecom scandal, and the accounting fraud...nothing will happen. Sad thing is that for the sake of clearing Inter they will likely clear a gangster too.

LA Times response: http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-spw-socce...32.story?page=1

Article from the LA Times: Juventus might be the most successful and the most popular club in Italy, but there are more than a few reasons not to celebrate the fact that the "Old Lady of Turin," as the club is nicknamed, on Sunday clinched a place in next season's European Champions League qualifying tournament. One reason is the wrist-slap Juventus received in the wake of the match-fixing and corruption scandal that tore Italy's Serie A apart in 2006. Being demoted to Serie B in 2007 was hardly a punishment befitting the crime. The penalty should have been much more severe. Why? Because Juventus immediately gained promotion back to Serie A, and, with a 5-2 victory over Lazio on Sunday, it clinched at least third place in the league behind Inter Milan and AS Roma to put it on course for the exceptionally lucrative Champions League. Coach Claudio Ranieri talked about how that was a just reward for all that the club had been through, and for the work such veteran players as Alessandro Del Piero, David Trezeguet and Pavel Nedved have put in. Patting the players on the back is all well and good, but the stain still remains from the days when disgraced former general manager Luciano Moggi and his cohorts were fixing matches. By Grahame L. Jones http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-spw-socce...0,6567386.story Response to the article: To whom it may concern, An LA Times article recently landed on my desk and I feel the obligation to respond to author Grahame L. Jones for his ill informed attempt to cover a scandal that is obviously well beyond his scope. In an article entitled ?Juventus success does not erase ugly past? Grahame attempts to undermine Juventus? triumphant return to the European elite with what appears to be references to tabloids, hearsay, and urban legends. It is hardly uncommon for English based newspapers to use questionable sources in lieu of credible ones when a language barrier exists however I must say, I expected a little more professionalism from the LA Times. Perhaps instead of utilizing translations from the Inter owned RCS Media Conglomerate?s tabloids like the giornalaccio rosa and the Corriere Mr. Jones would have been wise to reference the actual sentence published by the FIGC after the trial that clearly stated on page 74 that no game was actually fixed. Maybe learning that since the scandal all of Moggi?s ?cohorts? have been absolved of any wrongdoing would shock him?but it has occurred. Does Mr. Jones believe that Mr. Moggi was fixing matches by all by himself through telepathic hypnosis? Before claiming that Juventus? punishment ?hardly fit the crime? he should have learned what that crime was. Again referencing actual trial documents (found on the FIGC?s website in the archive section) it would likely stun him to know that the team?s managers were convicted of unsportsmanlike conduct and not match fixing, an infraction that calls for a 3-5 point penalty and not relegation. That the punishment didn?t fit the crime is correct but his presentation of it was propagandist at best. In the future it would be beneficial to have your writer?s do proper background research on topics prior to printing an article that will have your readers rolling their eyes. He could start here with the actual sentence publication from the very judges that presided over the tribunal: http://www.figc.it/it/214/2006/07_8/ComunicatoStampa.shtml ...it?s the third link down. Of course Grahame?s opinion of Italy?s most successful team is far from anyone?s priority list. Our objective is not to convince an uninformed American writer but rather to convince the judges who have already accepted our appeal in the European Courts. We the fans and shareholders have taken this injustice to the proper setting and are adamant that all that belongs to our team will be returned in due time. I wonder if Mr. Jones will be so eager to write an article when all is said and done. Furthermore I wish to inform Mr. Jones that defamation of character is still a punishable offence across international waters and he wouldn?t be the only one explaining himself if we were to feel inclined. Bigger people than Grahame are currently shaking in their boots knowing that European Judges are looming. If I can offer a suggestion to Mr. Jones it would be to avoid getting our attention. Socio di Giu Le Mani Dalla Juve

As far as the new charges, just laugh. It's bullshit designed to hinder Juve in the marketplace. Juventus was already convicted of a general Article 1 violation for 2004-2005 therefore they can't do shit to Juve now because the charge is the same (Article 1) and for the same time frame (2004-2005). Sit back and enjoy Europe people...we are in. Besides, the accusation is retarded. They are saying that Moggi gave referees foreign SIM cards. In truth the prosecutors do not even know if the numbers Moggi was calling were of referees at all. See they have no recordings at all. They have phone tables (I posted videos showing how easy those are to falsify) that state that Moggi called a number. If that number attached to a network in the Bari area while say Paparesta was in the Bari area, it is assumed he called Paparesta…that’s it. That’s their accusation. It’s almost funny. Sleep easy. We are going to Europe. Oh ya, in two weeks Giu Le Mani will be in court beginning their appeals in Italy. It will be a long process but as promissed GLMDJ will fight for Juve.

Sorry guys, I realized that those arrest links didn't work. These will. http://www.corriere.it/Primo_Piano/Cronach...0/telecom.shtml http://www.repubblica.it/2006/08/sezioni/c...ni-arresti.html http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/sezioni/c...to-mancini.html http://www.dirittiglobali.it/articolo.php?id_news=613 http://ciccio.ilcannocchiale.it/?yy=2006&mm=9 http://www.corriere.it/Primo_Piano/Cronach...m_arresti.shtml

Yesterday we received the results of the TAR Regional Court regarding Moggi?s appeal. The court rejected the appeal and maintained Moggi?s 5 year ban from Italian football. I have and can provide the rejection publication. Obviously now all the retards who have something to say against us will be adding a new argument to their dwindling arsenal of urban legends and that disgusts me but there are a few things to clear up. Luciano Moggi was not found guilty and no new evidence was presented that could discredit what he and his defenders have been saying for the last two years. His appeal was rejected and the brief explanations are just as absurd as the rest of the farce. Here's what the court stated; The season was legitimate, the games were not fixed, no bribery or threatening occurred BUT Luciano Moggi used his influence to condition referees psychologically and condition the designers psychologically in order to obtaining favorable referees. ARE YOU F%*#ING KIDDING ME?!!! This is the same court (TAR) that absolved all the referees, and all the referee designers so far. It is the same court that has admitted that no game was altered and that no referee selection process was ever tampered with. So what exactly did Moggi do and with who? This psychological conditioning bullshit is just a way to isolate Moggi and save all the others. With this new excuse we no longer need proof of a payment, or a call with an actual threat etc. etc. All we need is fancy wording and a winning season. There were no calls between Moggi and referees (except when Paparesta called him got trashed and hung up on in about 9 seconds). All the referees admitted they never spoke with him. Moggi was in no decision making position like say Galliani or Carraro (then) or Moratti (now) so where the hell was the psychological conditioning? What could he use to condition referees? We got our answer...this is depressing. The rejection states that Moggi managed to psychologically convince the referees (without speaking to them) to favor Juventus apparently without them acknowledging that they were doing it since the same court absolved them of any wrong doing and confirmed that they did not communicate with Moggi. In other words, Luciano Moggi must be a Buddhist monk who practices telepathy and is simultaneously and expert in hypnosis as he managed to fix referees without saying a word and without the referees noticing that they were under his influence. How can something so absurd occur in a civil court? Here you go: Pasquale de Lise http://www.specchioeconomico.com/2005_09/delise.html http://www.figc.it/it/31/3125/Struttura.shtml Pasquale de Lise is the president of the TAR Regional Court and simultaneously the President of FIGC's Commission of Sports Justice. When Luciano appealed he appealed as Luciano Moggi vs. FIGC and more specifically the FIGC's Sports Justice departments (CAF and CF). Essentially the very entity that employs the president of the Court he was appealing to (de Lise). Conflict of interest? Are we surprised? Don?t be fooled however because it's not his last appeal. He can go to the State Council and then to the European Court. In actual fact the TAR Court is merely a stepping stone on the way to the Supreme Federal Courts. Our Association (Giu Le Mani Dalla Juve) released a statement today claiming that we will begin our appeal on Juventus? behalf (which can result in our scudetti being rightfully returned) on May 15th 2008 in the same TAR Regional Court. Though we are fairly certain that the appeal will be unsuccessful, it will serve as a platform to go to the State Council and more importantly the European Court where our lawyer (Luc Mission of the Bosman case) is already preparing the preliminaries. Furthermore the Association is prepared to take the appeal to the Human Rights Court also under the European Umbrella. We are Juventini...we don?t stop for shit!

Guido Rossi has just been named FIAT's consultant...more confirmation of the Inside Job.

Disturbing revelation? Last week La Stampa published an online article which went into detail regarding the interrogations of former Telecom Managers and specifically that of Giuliano Tavarolli which came from the Milanese Prosecutors. The article was online for a few hours and then mysteriously disappeared. Why? I have an idea why. The article was saved by a few hardcore Juventus fans and I obtained a copy. After reading through it I read much of what we already knew (i.e. Telecom was spying illegally and manipulating wires). The new aspect from Tavarolli?s confession is a shock however. We all thought that Moratti and Tronchetti were authorizing the activities (as per Moratti?s admission in interviews). Tavarolli painted a much more detailed picture. Prior to the wires being sent to police in order to be authorized for court (two police officers with criminal records regarding evidence tampering by the way Arcangioli/Auricchio), Moratti and Tronchetti would themselves be intimately involved in the manipulation. They would decide what to eliminate, and what to present to the courts for instance. You can see why the article went missing. None the less copies can be found in various forums. Here it is in Italian: ?Ipotesi di violazione dell?articolo 1 del codice di giustizia sportiva?, con questa intestazione questa mattina un fascicolo sar? aperto dall?Ufficio indagini della Federcalcio sulla vicenda Inter-De Santis-Vieri. I fatti. Nel 2002 l?arbitro Nucini ha un colloquio con Facchetti e gli racconta di alcuni strani rapporti tra Moggi, l?arbitro De Santis e i dirigenti sportivi Fabiani e Pavarese. Facchetti chiede a Nucini di riferire i fatti alla Procura di Milano (visto che lo stesso aveva perplessit? a rivolgersi alla giustizia sportiva), ma non fu fatto nulla. Allora l?Inter si rivolse alla Polis d?Istinto, l?agenzia investigativa di Emanuele Cipriani (legato al responsabile del Cnag della Telecom, Giuliano Tavaroli) per far pedinare De Santis. Da quel momento fu aperto un dossier dal significativo nome in codice: operazione ladroni. Sarebbero, per?, anche stati intercettati i telefoni di De Santis e della moglie. Gli stessi furono anche seguiti, fotografati, furono fatte indagini patrimoniali e sui conti correnti. Alla fine il dossier si chiude dicendo che ?non furono trovate anomalie nel tenore di vita del soggetto?. Contemporaneamente furono intercettate le telefonate di Bobo Vieri e l?attaccante fu anche pedinato, ma soltanto nell?ambito di un ?controllo? della societ? sul calciatore. A seguito del decreto legge del Governo sulle intercettazioni illegali, ? tornata d?attualit? la vicenda. Perch? fu commissionata una inchiesta da parte di un?agenzia investigativa e non fu fatto n? un esposto alla magistratura, n? una denuncia all?Ufficio indagini? Il voluminoso materiale raccolto sull?arbitro, oltre che valutare il suo tenore di vita, a cosa mirava? E le foto? L?argomento interessa, intanto, anche la Procura di Napoli che nel 2004 proprio a Tavaroli si rivolse per comunicare le intercettazioni delle utenze di Moggi, Bergamo, Pairetto. S? proprio a Tavaroli che era a capo del Cnag, il centro nazionale autorizzazioni giudiziarie della Telecom, che quindi venne a conoscenza dell?indagine che i magistrati Beatrice e Narducci stavano conducendo proprio sulle stesse persone. Una coincidenza, chiaramente, ma che alla luce degli ultimi sviluppi diventa inquietante: Tavaroli ha detto ai pm che lui riferiva tutto a Carlo Buora, amministratore delegato Telecom e vice presidente dell?Inter. Tutti sanno che in realt? Buora non muoveva un passo senza il nulla-osta di Tronchetti Provera. E? fin troppo facile chiudere il cerchio. L?Inter ? nei guai. Guai seri. Tutti hanno capito che le intercettazioni sono state filtrate e fornite al bacio alla Procura di Napoli dalla lobby Telecom di Tronchetti & C. attraverso Tavaroli. Eccoci allo scoop dell?ultima ora: inizialmente, tutti avevano ravvisato, senza dar troppo peso alla cosa in quel momento, che le intercettazioni erano state manipolate e interpretate prima di giungere nelle mani dei magistrati partenopei. Ufficialmente si pensava che fossero stati i Carabinieri di Roma ad aver interpolato con spiegazioni non dovute le sbobinature (azione che peraltro non ? loro consentita). In realt? il lavoro di indirizzo era avvenuto ben prima e pi? in alto. Si parla proprio in quest?ottica del coinvolgimento diretto di Moratti e Tronchetti Provera. A questo riguardo Tavaroli adesso sta tentando di fare da parafulmine per salvare le posizioni dei due e soprattutto per tutelare il proprio tesoretto nascosto e, probabilmente, da loro garantito. Alla Procura di Milano, per?, hanno gi? capito dove e cosa cercare e non ? esclusa in futuro una collaborazione di Tavaroli per alleggerire la propria difficilissima posizione giudiziaria. Insomma tutte le intercettazioni al centro di Calciopoli sono state confezionate su misura per abbattere dei bersagli precisi: persone e societ? considerate nemiche. La giostra gira ancora? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------?--

a) Support the team...just don't watch games on enemy TV stations or use Telecom payphones etc. It's not an attendance boycott. That would only target Juventus. Not the right objective. b) thanks but I didn't write the letters. I translated them for the English speakers. It was the Ultras at VS that wrote it. Lastly, GEA trial update. It is laughable. Moggi and company have been accused of blackmailin shitty players (like Fresi) to accept transfers to other teams. One by one testimonials have been heard thrughout March confirming that it is all bullshit. It is becoming obvious that all will be absolved. Among the bringers of truth was our very own David Trezeguet who testified defending Luciano Moggi.

Various Ultra Groups in collaboration with DOCs and web forums like Vecchia Signora and J1897 have written official demands that are to be met or a mass boycott will be launched. We need to make these pricks understand what our numbers are and what a boycott would mean. I translated both letters and copied all the addresses as well. Copy paste and send! LETTER OF PROTEST #1 With the present communication, we wish to express our discontent regarding the scandalous officiating of Dondarini that follows many other proceeding incidents equally controversial this season. As Juventus and football fans, as well as paying customers of the sport itself, WE DEMAND respect. Officiating like that witnessed Saturday evening, only prompts anger and violence, and encourages further ill intended officiating by brushing aside clear penalties not awarded as human error while preserving the status quo. We are demanding immediate action regarding the officiating of our squad to the full possible extent, should such incidents persist, we are ready to launch a mass boycott through agreements established throughout the organized Juventus fan base of all newspapers, magazines, TV/Satellite transmissions etc that sustain the world of football. LETTER OF PROTEST #2 To the attention of the FIGC and Lega Calcio, We Juventini, after witnessing the indisputable manner in which this championship is being falsified with officiating decisions that border on absurd, which continue to damage the progress of Juventus while favoring certain clubs, WE DEMAND that the FIGC put an immediate halt on the league in order to conduct an internal investigation of all directors, assistants and referees. We the fans of Juventus are exhausted by the incomprehensible manner in which this championship has been falsified with the purpose of damaging one society in particular (something NO other season has ever witnessed). In order to see to it that our club receives the proper treatment we are ready, united and compact like never before, to take our fight with YOU the FIGC to the competent external legal parties that can ensure proper action. Where your farce of a trial came short in ensuring a clean game, we the fans of Juventus are anxious once and for all to shed light on this situation with the Civil Magistrates, and other organisms of Justice that previously went ignored by some, in order to clarify the conflicts of interest that govern the game between certain personalities that fund our sport and their connection to our league and specifically certain societies. We Juventini will not be satisfied with your senseless and incoherent explanations and excuses that further add confusion, nor will we tolerate your fake provisions for a better game that seldom see the light of day like the promises again made after the scandalous actions of Reggina-Juventus. We are adamant that there is ill intent directed at our club and we intend to move forward in the direction of a concrete resolution in the institutions that can provide a real change. We would like to add that the rights that our Constitution guarantees, with particular reference to the right to Civil Justice which were clearly violated during Calciopoli, will not be our only course of action due to our readiness to organize a mass and total boycott which will be extended to every single aspect of the football world in our nation which includes but is not limited to TV and newspapers that sponsor the game. We are 10 million strong in Italy alone who have been loyal customers of your pseudo-sports world and know the extent of what a mass boycott could mean to you financially. In closing we wish to express that if our demand is not met with proper attention, we will launch all that has been promised. We will not change our position by so much as a millimeter! Grazie. Tifosi Bianconeri controcampo@mediaset.it ; domenicasportiva@rai.it ; segreteriaaia@aia.it ; segregen@lega-calcio.it ; figc.presidenza@figc.it ; figc.segreteria@figc.it ; diretta@ilprocessodibiscardi.it ; cverdelli@giornalaccio rosa.it ; posta@tuttosport.com ; direttastadio@7gold.tv; redazione@corrieredellosport.it ; direttore@corriere.it ;

I'm waiting for updates myself. Things will begin soon.